I’ve spent the last decade of my life working for, with, and in education. After five years of college, struggling through tons of ridiculous interviews, and slogging my way through too many tedious days of subbing, I’m finally tenured at a good school filled with great people – most of whom I actually like and enjoy working with! So, why in the world am I considering giving it up?
I have never before considered a more radical change to my life. Deciding to get married, deciding to have a kid – these were things that were just right. They were effortless choices. My life has a trajectory and I have never veered from course. Now, at the age of 31, I feel I’ve finally hit the first big fork in my road. As an English teacher, I’m apt to quote the over-used Frost poem: “Two roads diverged in a yellow wood…” The problem is that both paths are appealing to me. One day I want to go left, and the next I’m certain right is right for me.
When I was in my mid-twenties, I always said that I would be a stay at home mom. I was very righteous in declaring that I wanted to be the one to teach my child all the basics and that I wanted my children to know that I was there for them just as my mother had been for me when I was young. I didn’t want anyone else raising my child. Of course, that was all before I got a permanent job. Once I started working, my attitude shifted. No doubt about it, I wasn’t giving up the job I had worked so hard for and that I got so much fulfillment from for a kid! I could do both – work and be a fantastic mother. And up until the birth of my first child, this is how I felt for many years.
Now, after 7 months of maternity leave, this damn kid has me entranced. All those cliché things that people say about having kids – the ones that, before you have a child, you doubt could possibly be true and roll your eyes at – the ones that they write about in boring greeting cards and talk about in cheesy Lifetime movies – are completely true. It’s just this big – HUGE – emotion that can’t be described or explained. And it’s really fantastic. Being with my daughter makes me feel incredible happiness. Showing and teaching her new things has been just as/more rewarding than most of the teaching I’ve done in the classroom – and she’s really just starting to learn!
I know, I know...I have it hard, having to choose between two appealing paths. I have three months until I’m supposed to go back to work, and my current opinions wildly pendulum back and forth, back and forth. On Monday, I’m crying every time I even look at the baby and think about leaving. On Tuesday, I’m devising a new lesson plan to use upon my return. On Wednesday, I’m writing a resignation letter. On Thursday, I’m checking my work email and talking to co-workers about next year. And on, and on, and on… It’s gotten to the point where the decision between home and work is on my mind far too much, at times making me a complete mental case. This morning, it was the first thing I thought about when I opened my eyes, and I’m sure it will be running through my mind tonight when I trying to get some sleep. It's bringing me down!
Unlike many new moms who have to go back to work for monetary reasons, I am lucky enough to be financially sound without working. My husband – who completely supports whatever decision I make (but really enjoys having me stay home) – makes enough money to support us and our lifestyle. That being said, I am a financial planner and worrier. To me, having a second income is safer and it allows for more savings, vacations, comfort, peace of mind, etc. Plus, it feels good to earn an income that is mine. People like to say that life isn’t about the money, but let’s be honest. Money affords the ability to do more things, to see more places, and to feel less vulnerable.
Still, the money issue really isn’t weighing on me so much. I could always pick up a part time job at a school or a library or as a tutor or editor. I’m pretty smart, so I could really do anything – maybe even go back to school or work on that dream writing career I’ve always talked about been never really whole-heartedly attempted. If I quit my job, I probably wouldn’t quit working all together, but I would be stepping off that career ladder that I’ve started to climb. When I begin teaching again after my children start school, I will be starting over in a field where there are tons of applicants and very few available positions. In todays’ world, it has become more popular for a woman to be both a worker and a home maker. Whether it is because of a poor economy or the presence of more single mothers, the Census says that more than 60% of women who had recently given birth were in the work force. It’s the norm to be a working mom. It seems to be what’s expected.
For me, working is not an impossibility, but is just as much of a sacrifice as staying at home would be. If I go to work, there are going to be things that I can’t do – things that I’m not going to have time for – for myself and my daughter. When I do something, I give it all of my attention and effort. During the school year, I’m at work early, I stay late, and I am always grading or making plans. It’s all I seem to think or talk about. I could never be that lazy teacher who relies of tenure and just sits back while the kids run amok. I could see a chaotic world where I divide my time between work and home, but I worry that other areas are going to suffer. When will I have time for my husband or myself? Is that crazy, always on-the-go life what I want? Right now, I get to spend all the time I want with my daughter AND I get to do a lot of things that I've always wanted to do but have never had time for. Am I just being lazy? Is this fair to my husband who doesn't get a choice?
Really, I have the perfect situation and job for being a working mother. My mother and mother-in-law are available to babysit, so I wouldn’t have to send my daughter to daycare, and I would have those long summers to enjoy being at home. Still, the thought of my child spending the majority of her time with people other than her parents makes me sad (even though her grandparents are hands down the best). Do I want to hear about Olivia’s firsts or do I want to be here for them all? Do I want to be there each morning when my daughter wakes up? Do I want to be the one to show her the world and teach her about everything? Or would I be satisfied sharing in those responsibilities?
When I think about what’s best for my daughter, I think the answer is clearly me staying home. These last few months have been the best of my life, and all of my family has never been closer or happier. I even get to spend more time with my parents, sisters, in-laws, and friends. I wonder why I would mess with a good thing. At the same time, my future gets a lot scarier and lot more unpredictable if I’m at home. If I go back to work, I know what I’m in for every day, and that reassurance could provide the stability that we need to sustain our happiness. I love my job, and although it frustrates me to no end at times, I can’t imagine not being a teacher. It’s how I’ve defined myself for many years now. What would my life be without that definition? If you take away the lines that define me, do I become airy, peaceful, and light or do I just ooze out all over the floor in a lumpy mess?
When I share this issue with others, I tend to see two strongly opinionated sides: some people think I’m insane to stay home while others think that I’d be nuts not to. Mothers tend to say that they would have chosen to stay at home if they could have afforded it. I hear a lot of people saying, “You will never get these years back” while referencing how fast their own children seemed to grow up. Someone very smart asked me which I would regret more at the end of my life: staying home with my daughter or quitting my job. I think that’s definitely a key question I am asking myself. There’s no way to know how I’m going to feel in a year (or tomorrow, for that matter), so all I can do is hunker down and try to figure out what will make my family the happiest and the most content.
Please, share your ideas and opinions with me! I want to know what you think about being a working woman vs being a stay at home mom. Leave a comment below or message/email me your thoughts! As I struggled with these ideas, I remembered the good old blog that I've neglected for the last year, and I decided that airing out my brain online might be tortuous fun. It’s taken me a week to write this in between naps and quiet moments alone, so while I’d like to promise more writings in the immediate future, I can currently commit to nothing (as attested to in this blog). Man, they need to invent a pill for indecisiveness.
Oh, I just noticed I’m publishing this on National Teacher Appreciation Day (May 8). Apropos, don’t you think?
Census info: www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/facts_for_features_special_editions/cb11-ff07.html
As the readers of this blog well know, Oscar time is throw down time in Casa Lovely/Parry. With less than two months to go until this year’s Academy Awards (airing February 27th), official movie watching has commenced. Each year, Entertainment Weekly’s 25 movies to see before the Oscars list gets hung up on our fridge, and the movies get scratched out with a red Sharpee as we wind our way through as many as possible. We’ve never hit all 25 movies, but in past years we’ve always been close. It all, of course, leads to our cut-throat contest (current reigning champ: me), where we secretly vote on each category and see who can predict the most winners.
This year, for some reason or another, we’ve gotten a pretty good head start; we’ve already watched 11 of the 25 movies. Below you will find opinions on and odds for these contenders.
In one word: Over-rated
Inception was an average movie with a unique plot. It is easily understandable by anyone with the remotest sense of an intellect. I was largely disappointed, and I didn’t think about the movie at all after having watched it.
Chances for an Oscar: Little to no chance in any category other than special effects. It may get a Best Picture nomination based on its popularity.
In one word: Timely
There is some great dialogue in this movie, and the subject matter was very interesting (although I question the amount of truth present), but it wasn’t anything more than what I expected it to be. I feel like a movie that is popular because it is about something, like Facebook, that is so prevalent in culture needs to also affect the viewers’ opinions and make them question things around them. This movie was all about exposition; I didn’t really learn anything worthwhile.
Chances for an Oscar: High – This movie has won all the important awards so far. I think people like it because it’s all about such a “hip” topic. Whatever. I did really like Jesse Eisenberg’s performance. He’ll definitely be nominated for Best Actor. Best Screenplay and Best Director, will also be categories this movie shows in.
In one word: Trippy
This film turned out to be exactly what I was looking for – an intense, thought-provoking movie. My husband and I discussed this film more than any other. It was one of the only films that I had a real reaction to. As usual, Aronofksy blends reality and hallucination perfectly.
Chances for an Oscar: High – this will be another top contender. Natalie Portman really should win Best Actress. I can’t even imagine how much work went into this role. She pulled off bat-shit insane well. I would think it would also definitely be up for Best Director.
In one word: Intense
Despite the fact that anyone going to see this movie already knows what’s going to happen, the suspense is riveting. You will sit on the edge of your chair with your hand over your mouth and your eyes half shut as you watch. The movie will remind you how incredibly weak you would be in any situation that remotely resembles Aron Ralston’s. Amazingly, I wasn’t bored for even a second watching a movie containing really only one character and taking place in one claustrophobic set.
Chances for an Oscar: Nominated for Best Picture, but no chance at a win. James Franco is the host of this year’s Oscars, and I suspect that his new-found popularity might lead him to a win as Best Actor. Danny Boyle should get a Best Director nomination for what he did with so little.
In one word: Affleck!
I really, really liked this movie. I also feel that it is the movie that would most appeal to the masses. I can’t imagine that anyone would dislike it. Interesting characters, as well as tons of action and suspense, make this movie compulsively watchable. My love/hate relationship with Ben Affleck has moved more towards a love/love relationship. Damn you, Affleck!
Chances for an Oscar: Affleck won’t pick up even a nomination for acting or directing, but he might pull one out for adapted screenplay. I would like to see this movie nominated for Best Picture, but it’s a tight race this year. Jeremy Renner has gotten a lot of buzz, and I’m sure he’ll get a well-deserved nom for Best Supporting Actor.
In one word: Weep-fest
You know what’s crazy about this movie? I watched it immediately after watching Rabbit Hole (see below), and of the two, I wept uncontrollably only at Toy Story 3. Gah. Stupid children’s toys and growing up! Why does Pixar feel the need to make their audience cry so much?
Chances for an Oscar: Although I haven’t seen any of its competition yet, I can’t believe that any cartoon will beat TS3 for Best Animated Film. It will likely also be nominated for Best Picture.
In one word: Over-hyped
I was completely unimpressed with this movie. It was good, but it wasn’t anything special. It is supposedly the movie that finally depicts a gay couple and their family in a completely natural way, but it seems odd to me that it has gotten all of its notoriety for this very reason. Frankly, I was bored at times when watching, and I thought the ending was completely disappointing.
Chances for an Oscar: This movie is a favorite with the critics. It will definitely be nominated for Best Picture, but I don’t think it will win. I’m sure it will have several acting nominations. Annette Bening was good, but I don’t think she was anywhere near Natalie Portman in Black Swan. If she wins, it will be because of Hollywood favoritism.
In one word: Stark
This is a little-known film that your average moviegoer hasn’t even heard of. Just the landscape of the movie – impoverished, rural middle America – is more desolate than any desert in 127 Hours. Watching the main character of this film try to hold together a family in this environment is quite powerful. The story is interesting enough, the acting is fantastic, and in the end, there’s a scene that will stick with you for days.
Chances for an Oscar: I think this film will get a nomination for Best Picture, as well as a Best Actress nominee for Jennifer Lawrence – an amazing young actress. John Hawkes deserves a
Best Supporting Actor nomination for his portrayal of Teardrop, the best named character of the year.
In one word: Surprising
For a movie that really hasn’t gotten much attention, Rabbit Hole really surprised me – in a good way. I enjoyed it. It has just the right amount of dark humor and sadness. As a person who enjoys a film that will make me cry, I was surprised at how the story was more uplifting than depressing. Unlike the make-me-want-to-die Revolutionary Road from a few years back, this is a film about two people who survive tragedy and learn how to rebuild their lives.
Chances for an Oscar: I’m thinking it might not even get a Best Picture nom, but both Nicole Kidman and Aaron Eckhart deserve nominations.
(I have also seen Alice in Wonderland and The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, two films on EW’s list of 25 must-see’s that I feel won’t make much of a splash at the Oscar’s. AiW will get a special effects nom and TGwtDT’s Noomi Rapace should get a Best Actress nom but sadly will not.)
We still have several films left in our queue to see (most excited for The King’s Speech), but that’s all for now! Let me know if you’ve seen any of the films above and what you thought about them. You still have over a month before the Oscars! Get viewing!
This year for Christmas, my husband (the almighty genius that he is) scored us two tickets to the Winter Classic! Thanks to some guy's spelling mistake on Ebay, we were able to score great seats – front row balcony just left of center ice. We had a fantastic view of the ice, as well as the massive crowd around us. Armed against the weather with multiple layers of clothing, we spent the night watching hockey under the stars (er, clouds).
I hesitate to mention this, but I have to confess that Parry and I could have been the cause of our loss. Going against every hockey-loving-superstitious bone in my body, I agreed to switched seats with some guys who wanted to sit with their friends. True, the view was the same, but what if our slight shift to the right was just enough to upset the hockey gods and send the Pens into a downward spiral of goalie blunders and lackluster play?! Couldn't be...
So yeah, we didn't win, but it was still quite awesome to experience.
Here are my highlights and lowlights of the evening:
PROS
Hearing that many freakin’ people chant “Let’s go Pens!” as they crossed the street outside the stadium and marched up ramp after ramp to get to their seats. It echoed through that stadium.
The return of a much missed Jordan Staal
The fact that the stadium was at least a third Caps fans; it made it more rival-liscious
The city and the Christmas tree gloriously lit up in the background
The overwhelming BOOOOO! that surged over the crowd every time Ovechkin appeared on the big screen. I respect the Capitals and actually enjoy a few of their players, but I CANNOT stand that prig.
The introduction of blue jerseys that don’t suck as much as the throwback baby-blues
The little kid who held up this sign on the jumbotron:
Ha!
Watching the game under the lights. I was happy the game was moved back; night-time made it more standout unique.
Kris Letang making pretty much every shot on goal. I like Letang.
My new thermal shirt and pants were magic! I never felt even a draft. Witchcraft, I tell you!
“Free” seat cushions and trading cards….oooooooooooooooooh.
CONS
We played like crap; the Caps won.
Rain (Although I will say it wasn't that bad to sit in, really. I'm sure it was a bitch to play in.)
The way the Steelers infect everything in Pittsburgh; they were everywhere. Ugh.
$40 to park…miles away…
Commemorative hot chocolate cups: sold out before I could get one.
Neither Crosby nor Ovechkin earned a point. Most disappointing rivalry ever!
Shitty bands: some band I can’t even recall and The Clarks (yawn). Styx, of course, played “Renegade.” At yet another Pittsburgh event - surprising. I would have enjoyed any other song.
Single moment that made it all worthwhile:
As we all shuffled down the exit ramp, instead of being surrounded by boastful or bitter words, the crowd was suddenly united, swept up into a chant of “Flyers suck!” A tear came to my eye. It was a great moment.
Overall, despite the painful loss (that I'm sure will hurt even more after Wednesday's 24/7), the Winter Classic was totally worthwhile. Though more ideal circumstances would have been preferred, it was a good time - something to experience that I might never get a chance to see again! I'm only sorry that I couldn't have spent a little more time cheering ecstatically and a little less time shaking my head in disbelief (I'm looking at you my sometimes fictitious boyfriend Fleury!).
Warm up
Crowd Shots
Yesterday, I saw the best show of my life. Not only that, but I got to see it in a sparkling new stadium. I’m writing this the morning after, and can I still feel residual excitement in my skin. (I can also feel something “residual” in my eardrum. Attending a rock show with a busted eardrum? Probably not wise – but so worth it.) My husband, Parry, and I, as well as my sister and her boyfriend (shout out to Jim!) were among the 18,000+ people who got to see Sir Paul McCartney play at the Consol Energy Center Thursday night, but for those of you who weren’t so lucky, let me give you the breakdown.
It goes without saying that Paul McCartney is a big enough draw on his own, but the Pittsburgh crowd seemed equally amped to see the new arena. We arrived at the CEC before the front doors were opened and the lines were down the block. People occupied themselves ogling any bit of arena they could see through the giant wall of windows before them. Despite the lines’ length, we were through the doors mere minutes after they opened. We walked around the new dig slack-jawed and awed. Here are two helpful tips for those who will be visiting the CEC in the future: First, your tickets are no longer checked at the door. They are actually scanned inside before you go up the steps to get to your seats. This means, I assume, that people without tickets can get in and shop at the awesome-looking new Pens store right at the entrance. Second, the box office is inside the building next to the store. You have to go into the lower Trib Total Media Entrance to get there.


I just thought of a third thing I wanted to mention, too. We parked in the new garage that is attached to the arena. The cost was $20, but it was something new, so we tried it. What is really nice about parking there was the ease of leaving. There are doors on each floor of the arena that lead right into the garage. I think that perhaps the majority of people didn’t realize the doors were there, as we were two of four people I saw using them. We literally went from our seats to our car to the open road in 4 minutes. I can definitely see the plus in parking there.
Parry’s first comment upon our entrance into the arena was, “Where’s the familiar urine smell?” Ha! Everything is so clean and white and fresh. It smells like “new” – that plastic-y, just unwrapped new smell. What I like best about the arena is that it is truly a home for the Penguins. Columns and walls are filled with pictures of players, past and present, and everything is there for the Pens. The players must be so happy to have such a place. As for the seating, the aisles and the seats are wider. Yeah! The jumbotron, which was pulled up to the (flat) ceiling and not used for the concert looks really nice and big. I just don’t think there is a bad seat in that place. I cannot wait to see my first game there. Hockey fans are in for a real treat.

Paul McCartney took the stage about 45 minutes late (both days I hear – what a diva), but the crowd didn’t seems to care. He played for roughly three hours straight and sang 37 songs (suck it Wednesday night people - we got three more songs than you!), covering songs from the Beatles to present day. He played the bass, acoustic and electric guitar, ukulele, mandolin, and a grand and upright piano. He switched instruments between almost every song, bringing out instrument after instrument to, as he put it, “show off.” That classic Hofner bass was there, as well as the original guitar he used to record “Eleanor Rigby” for Sgt. Pepper. As far as the “show” aspect of the concert went, the lighting and effects were modest but very cool to look at. There were also some awesome fireworks and explosions used in “Live and Let Die” and a bunch of confetti rained down on the crowd at the end of the show. During the Beatles songs, old footage played in the background, and I noticed that during “The End” the video from the closing scene from Beatles Rock Band was playing. Each song had a different look and feel when it came to the set, and I remember leaning over to Parry at least a half dozen times to say “Look at that!” or “Isn’t that cool?”
On stage, Paul was commanding. He was as charming and flirtatious as I expected him to be, winking and giggling, making silly jokes and being all around cheeky. Despite being 68 years old, Paul was full of energy, and let me tell you ladies, the sex appeal is still there. While he wasn’t running back and forth doing back flips, he did bop around the stage and dance at the mic, shaking his ass for the camera. What struck both Parry and I the most was how much he was enjoying himself. There was a genuine smile on his face through the entire show, and there were many long moments when he seemed to just be reveling in the limelight. His communication with the crowd was great, and he bantered back and forth, commenting on signs and telling some great stories. Among his tales were stories about Jimi Hendrix, Eric Clapton, the Russian/Soviet defense minister, and, of course, his fellow Beatles, John and George (no mention of Ringo, poor boy). There was also a proposal in the crowd (during “My Love”), a baby who got some screen time, and a girl who got her upper thigh signed on stage (lucky bitch).
I thought Paul sounded great. You could tell, at the end of the night, that his voice was getting tired and a few of the higher notes were brought down or skimmed over, but on songs like “Helter Skelter” or “I Got a Feeling” he pulled off that necessary roughness. I was in no way disappointed by the sound quality. His playing skills were impressive to watch, and you could tell that playing a chord and plucking a string is so ingrained in who he is that there isn’t really any effort needed. I’m always unhappy with arena concerts in that the audience more often than not chooses to stay seated. For the second half of the concert, however, people were happy (and drunk) enough to want to dance, so we were up and moving. Everyone was singing and swaying, and lighters (and cellphones) lit up the crowd. It was an all-in-all comfortable and celebratory crowd.
If you’ve hung out with me for even two minutes in the last year and a half, you know that I’m a bit Beatles obsessed. I’ve been a huge Beatles fan since my teenage years, but the more recent re-release of their albums really proved to me how incredible they were. While John is by far my favorite Beatles, seeing Paul McCartney play was huge for me. This was probably my one and only chance to see a member of not only my favorite band, but also the biggest band of all time. Watching Paul on stage and just thinking about all the music I’ve listened to, all the books I’ve read and movies I’ve watched – thinking about the sheer history behind him and his music – I was a bit in awe. Not surprising to anyone who knows me, I did find myself actually in tears twice. Once was when Paul sang “Here Today,” a song he wrote for John after his death that makes me cry every single time I hear it. The other time I teared up was during “Yesterday,” I think because the lady behind me was bawling. Crying is contagious for me – I just can’t help it. I was happy that Paul sang “Something” and had a little montage dedicated to George. Not only did Paul sing “Here Today” for John, but he also sang a mishmash of “A Day in the Life” and “Give Peace a Chance,” which was just lovely.
In all, it was a thrilling night that I hope I can relive in the future (don’t die Paul!). Parry and I took a few videos which you can see here: Videos. Many of the videos only cover the first few seconds of songs, as I wanted to capture a few classics while not ruining the moment by having to hold my phone up the whole time. In many of them you can hear me singing or screaming; I apologize ahead of time. A few of them are pretty cool though. There are also some pictures of the arena and concert here: Pictures. Below, I’ve included the one song that Parry filmed in whole: “Yesterday” and a clip of the crowd singing “Hey Jude.” Enjoy!
This blog is dedicated to Angela, my sister, who I have written about on this blog several times. She is known to have done a stupid thing or two throughout her life. This story is to make her feel better about all those things I tease her about mercilessly.

I’m a Q-tip fanatic. I adore them. I love them enough to have a pet name for them: ear squeegee. After every shower, I shove an ear squeegee in my ear hole because I no longer have the capacity to ignore the smallest drop of liquid anywhere near my inner ear.
So, Friday was a morning like every other. Wrapped in a towel, I stood in front of the bathroom mirror, clearing my ears, thinking about how I had dragged my ass out of bed at 6am for some blood work scheduled for 7. In the next second, something happened. I honestly don’t remember what. As I reached up and placed the Q-tip along the rim of my right ear, there was a noise or a movement – something suddenly caught my attention. Perhaps it was just my stomach rumbling, as I hadn’t eaten or had anything to drink in 12 hours (for the blood work). Perhaps Bunting chose that moment to push open the bathroom door. Or perhaps my body just decided to betray me and suddenly begin twitching at the most inopportune moment. Whatever it was, something caused my head to turn in the exact opposite direction of my Q-tip armed hand.
Have you ever had an inner ear injury? The pain is in your head – it’s everywhere – and it echoes through your whole body like a sickening fire. I was momentarily too stunned to recognize this pain. My hand closed around the end of the Q-tip protruding from the side of my head and pulled. As it came free from the ear, it was like a cork unleashing a tidal wave of pain. Clutching the side of my head, I exited the bathroom and had the good sense to call to Parry: “Parry? I think I just hurt myself bad.”
I wobbled my way into the bedroom, by then the side of my head a blaring siren. I winced my eyes closed and leaned over, my knees on the floor and my head in a pile of clean laundry on the top of the bed. At some point, Parry came into the room, and somehow, with my face smashed into bedspread, I explained to him what I did. I remember that I wanted to cry but I couldn’t do anything but gasp for breath and hold my head. I looked up, and suddenly my stomach clenched and I knew I was about to vomit. I stood up and a wave of vertigo washed over me. I reached out for the wall, and the next thing I knew, I was on the ground.
I’m not sure why I passed out. It could have been the extreme pain or dizziness brought on by inner ear injury. Parry suggests that I have trained myself to pass out when I need to vomit, as I’m deathly afraid to puke (this is a very likely suggestion). Whatever the reason, I found myself on the floor while a panicked Parry loomed over me. He said that for the few seconds I was unconscious I was speaking in tongues. Cool.
My ear hurt. But the dizziness had become manageable and the need to puke had passed. I got myself up and managed to pull myself together. We cancelled my blood work appointment, and I sat on the couch until I came to the realization that my ear wasn’t getting better. Aside from the throbbing along the side of my head and the sharp pain the accompanied burping, swallowing, hiccuping, or yawning, I felt like I was hearing through an ocean of water. I have never been to the emergency room (for myself), and this didn’t seem like a true emergency situation as blood wasn’t pouring out of my head.
I have to tell you, I felt like a complete ass. Parry really had to convince me to seek out medical attention because I didn’t even want to tell anyone what I had done. “I shoved a Q-tip in too far.” God. How embarrassing. The thought of being permanently deaf brought me to my senses though. We settled on MedExpress (another place I’ve never been).
Luckily the doctor didn’t laugh at me outright. She actually told me that it happens a lot. I reassured her that, yes, I did know that Q-tip were not meant to clean the ear and that, no, I would not be subjecting myself to a future ear-cleaning. I was thankful for the lack of open mockery (as I’m sure I will receive here). I was told that my eardrum, which is normally clear like Saran wrap, was bright purple and bent inward where it had been hit. I was lucky: no perforation. I was given some pain meds and ear drops. A follow up appointment was made for a few days later. I was told to look for blood and pus leaking from the ear (EW!), as there was a good chance my eardrum would rupture.
Over the next few days, I took the pills and the drops (ten drops at a time – ahhhhh, I hate it!), but by Monday, although the pain was largely dulled, I still felt like I was hearing through water. There had been a small amount of blood in my ear on several occasions, as well. I also occasionally felt dizzy and there was, at times, a great deal of pressure in my head.
Tuesday was my return trip to the doctor, and I got the news I suspected: I had at some point perforated the eardrum. A new round of antibiotics were prescribed (these are seriously the biggest pills I’ve ever seen!!!), and I was sent on my way for a week of healing (let’s hope). I still can’t hear worth a good god damn, but most of the pain is gone (as I’m doped up). It’s really uncomfortable, having an inner ear injury. It just bothers you all the time – you feel weird. Sometimes I hear ringing, and most of the time I’m saying “huh?” whenever someone talks to me.
So, if you see me out and about in the next few weeks and you call out to me from across the way but I don’t answer, don’t hold it against me. I’m an idiot who broke my own ear with a Q-tip. [hanging head in shame].




I have so many thoughts about LOST’s finale that I didn’t even know where to begin. So, I watched it a second time, and now I’m just going to jump right in, but if my ramblings are strung together a bit incoherently or the order of my ideas is inconsistent, please forgive me. To me, a person who loves nothing more in life than a well-constructed and executed story – LOST has been a real experience. I’ve loved it all, and I loved its conclusion. The more I think about it, the more satisfied I am.
The first few minutes of LOST’s finale seemed somehow, for me, to be telling ones. The episode begins with flashes that alternate between island and sideways characters: Jack is in his office, looking at an X-ray and also in the stream, mulling over his new role as island guardian; Ben is making tea and also looking at Locke with something like dread in his eyes; Locke is heading off to surgery while (F)Locke coils rope; Kate sits in a car with Desmond but is also watching Jack from behind a tree. The Losties are divided; they are who they are, but they can’t let go of who they thought they should/would be – what they expected of their lives.
This show has very much been about the characters wanting to be free of the island – wanting to escape their destinies. Do they have the free will to just be able to walk away from it all? I say yes. Jacob didn’t have any choice when it came to his fate, so he made sure to give all his candidates a measure of free will. He can bring them to the island and point them at certain questions and truths, but in the end, it’s their choice. Jack decides to become the island’s protector; Kate decides to save Claire – they make these tough decisions and are rewarded by becoming better people. I feel that destiny and free will can indeed coexist. Many cultures have believed in both (the Greeks, for example). In LOST terms, Jack had a destiny: to save the island. Within that destiny, he made choices as to whether to do what he was supposed to or not. When he chose to try to escape his destiny, Jack was (self?) punished. He could have continued to run away, but in the end, he has to give in to it if he ultimately wants peace.
In my English class, I’m currently teaching my students about Joseph Campbell’s idea of the monomyth – the idea that humanity keeps telling the same story over and over again. There is a hero who is sent on an adventure in a strange land. The hero has an apotheosis – he realizes something about life and becomes a new person based on their new ideals. The hero must reconcile who he was with who he has become, and once he does this, he can reap a reward for his heroics. This is the journey of each of the characters, especially Jack.
I’ve been struggling with the sideways world and what it all “means,” but as I spend more time thinking about how it fits together, I’m starting to believe that our characters were just not ready to reconcile their two sides. They were clinging to who they once were and the possibilities of what their lives could have been without the island’s interference. They’ve created a world – the world as they think it should/would have happened. Sayid thinks that he is a killer deep down, so in this world, he still is a killer (albeit still with a heart filled with hope and good intentions). Jack thinks he could have fixed his problems and been a better father than Christian was to him, so that’s what he gets. They are putting off the inevitable – unable, perhaps, to say this is not who I ended up being. Even in this self-created world, however, the characters are drawn together, like they know the truth of it all somewhere way down deep. The sideways world shows them how things could be, but its real purpose is to prove to the Losties once and for all that they belong together.
A key line from this show has always been “live together, die alone.” While it’s true that the Losties lived together and Jack died alone (if you don’t count Vincent – holy god was that too much for me to handle), in the end, they are all together again. It’s almost like they are “living together” again. Whatever is going to happen to them next (Heaven, some other reality, reincarnation), they will face it together. This is their reward. Once they remember and realize that the island was what made them who they always wanted to be and that the island was what their life was all about, they can choose to move on. Jack, obstinate until the last, takes a little bit longer than everyone else, but in the end, even he can let go. Imagine that moment for Jack when he touches Christian’s coffin, when he sees his heroic story and recognizes all he had done – how much he grew and changed. He cries in his father’s arms, I think, out of relief and happiness once he realizes he’s dead. He knows that his life had a purpose and that he did something that really mattered.
No other moment simply encompassed the elation I felt watching this episode than the moment Hurley first sees Charlie in the hotel. Hurley’s eye sparkle with tears and you can see the happiness on his face. It doesn’t matter how good Hurley’s “sideways life” is, his island memories and friends are the best of what could ever happen to him. At every flash of memory in this episode, I cried like a little baby. Charlie/Claire and Sawyer/Juliet were the moments I was at my worst. And of course the whole ending was seen through a sheen of tears. I always thought Jack would die at the end, and I found his death to be perfect in every way. I also liked that Hurley got to be the protector – the Jedi master. He was the purest of all the characters, and it seemed that he was the obvious choice all along. I think that Hurley's rules for the game will be much more fair and understanding than Jacob's - a man who had just as many flaws as any other person.
There are so many other things that I enjoyed about this episode. There was some classic humor (Sawyer calling Lapidus “Chesty” or Lapidus asking Miles to fix the plane with duct tape). The acting was superb (Matthew Fox = Emmy). The Flocke/Jack fight scene on the cliff was just epic. I also thoroughly enjoyed all the “mirror images” from past scenes (Jack telling Desmond “I’ll see you in another life, brother” stands out in my mind). Yes, I have lingering questions (Did Jughead serve to do nothing other than move our characters in time and act as a red herring for viewers? Why wasn’t Christian in his coffin in season one when Jack found his coffin?), but I’m really glad that not every question was answered. What made LOST a special show was that you had to think about it; you couldn’t be a passive viewer and still reap all the rewards of watching. I was engaged until the very end and then some, and now I can continue to ponder these mysteries as I rewatch episodes later on.
What this show has always been about – more so than the mythology, science, or faith – is the characters. And I’m just happy that they all became the heroes that we always wanted them to be and, in the end, got what they deserved. I’ve read a lot of crap from people complaining that they didn’t get the answers they wanted to every last mystery or that they didn’t see certain characters again (Walt? C’mon! He’s like 6’ tall and 18 now – there’s nothing they could do! Eko? He didn’t want to come back!). I suggest that these people relax. If they go through their lives expecting neat answers to everything…well, I’ll just say that they need to let it go…
I’m prepared, ready, willing, and able to discuss everything/anything about LOST. Let’s get a dialogue going here, because what is LOST if not a conversation starter. What questions do you have? What did you love/hate? Post your comments below.
In what is likely the last LOST easter
egg,did you notice the "donkey wheel" in the glass window?:
